Final Company Project Presentations for the International Group

1. Shan
1. Sveta: 
1. Nice job 
2. formal and perhaps somewhat dry content? 
3. good switch from you to Katy with a smile in exchange.
2. Katy: 
1. Nice Job
2. Formal and perhaps somewhat dry content?
3. Good hand Gestures
3.  Both
1. Business (black and white)
2. good time management
3. There was more spark in your switch then the whole presentation?
   
2. Borgmann
1. Julie
1. Good and confident start
2. I like the Breadcrumb (=lack of organization) strategy.
3. Wholesale can not be compared to niche seller?
4. Calm, even with the small mess ups in the slide show order
5. Time = Good 
3.  Shan
1. Humaid:
1. Arrived 1,5 hour late.
2. Was supposed to bring the adapter for the Mac-slide show
3. Sound on the the mac to disturb Magdalena
4. Low or non-content contribution
5. I am sorry to say this, but considering your over all performance (and even if you may or may not have been sick), this would have to be noted as an EPIC failure. Perhaps this is just not the right environment or study for you? This is however my guess, if your convinced otherwise I would suggest a change of behavior perhaps?
   
2.  Sarah:
1. Calm and confident, even with out her team
2. Relates to Katy & Sveta's presentation
3. Compatibility problems from Mac presentation
4. Easy on the 'Yeah's'
5. Time pressure and stress managed very well 
6. consider having an Plan B for neglecting team-members, non the less points for pursuing team-spirit. However the time spend on this would most likely have been better on developing the project idea, but that is hard to say in the end as both solutions are neither the right or wrong one. 
4.  Saftfabrik
1. Carole
1. Good start
2. When did you become fluent in English? Nice! 
2. Anthony
1. Relates to what Carol said, good teamwork
2. perhaps a bit more audience aweareness?
3. good over-all performance 
3. Both
1. Good extention of mid-term
2. Method and tools, check.
   
5.  Mr. Holz leaves in the middle of the Carole and Anthony's question period (10.27-10.31)
6. Humaid arrives (10.31 -> 1,5 hours late)
   
7.  Gerry Weber
1. Magdalena
1. Waits for the disturbance to pass... Good
2. Hand outs for all, nice feature. (perhaps consider saving the trees and provide digital versions? Google Docs, perhaps?) Why are teachers getting colours? If feel mistreated! (haha)
3. '' Ehm's'' where you nervous?
4. A lot of Techniques and methods. Good, but perhaps to much for 15 mins?
5. which lead to time issues...
6. Remember less is more and your doing good.
   
8. 10.49 -> Mr. Metzker seems to be bored to death and can't stop yawning... 
1. Props to Mr. Wittig and Mr. Holz  for paying attention
2. Mr. Tamm seems to do either research on VBA or office work? (don't know which is more disturbing?)
   
9. Gerry Webber
1.  Stavroula
1. Adopted Magdalena's style of pp-slides, learning is good (impressive)!
2. Nice switch and job well done.
   
2. Hughe
1. perhaps not leave your Q-cards on the table? it seems to distract the eyes from the audience...
   
2. remember less is more and your structure will improve. 
3. Aris
1. Your (again, again) one the right side of your PP... good
2. never say: 'I don't know'
3. Good Pen-pointing
   
4.  All:
1. Good Litterature review + Evalation + Time management (and that with 3 people!) 
10. Audible
1. Remi
1. Not much to say here except ok performance, consider a stronger voice for next time perhaps? 
2. Charles
1. Nicely done.
2. better time management
3. Good voice and gestures 
3. Both
1. (By Katy) Light green and white is perhaps not the optimal choice?
   
11. Asperado
1. Jerome:
1. Where not in the mood today, where ya? You did so great on the last presentation, what happened? 
2. Very good overview, however for better audience acceptance consider:
   
1. Slides for all the infomation
2. Change of slides
3. leave the professors by professors (Mr. Kariger, was not there.)
4. Time yourself  
2.  Kevin
1. Good judgment on switch (saved Jerome).
2. Bold move with PC-Q-cards, practice more and it might work...
3. We want to see your eyes. 
3.  Both:
1. Poor time management
2. which lead to a ½ finished presentation 
12.  Asperado
1. Thomas
1. 12.00 = Goodday or Good afternoon. Good morning is less applicable.  
2. Consider a better use of your content
3. Eyes, pace and voice where all nicely done. 
13.  Asperado
1. Chris (comments by Katy)
   
1.  What efforts! Shaved and Tie -> BT WOW
2. Don't rush through the introduction, you missed to welcome us and the good morning part.
3. Good eye contact & body language (hand gestures)
4. Nicely referred to your hand-outs.
1. yeah, make them busy and interested (Chris: a lot of paper shifting was going on among the Profs!)
5.  Typo's!!!
6. Good time management 
14. Absolvent
    
1. Caroline
1. Good Job
2. Eye contact
3. Like the way you emphasized 'we need to' and 'we did' etc.
4. Looks like sound research
5. time is good

At this point I had to leave for an appointment and thus missed out on Sara, Maren and Anne's presentation. I would love to hear some feed back from this, perhaps see it?
@ Maren: I am sincerely sorry for missing out on evaluating you again, it just does not seem to be our faith. I almost finished the book, perhaps we can brain storm on it later this week?

The Project Development Presentations with Majetic and co-starring Eichhorn and Wittig 12-01-2010

1.Around the world
    1.Iris
1.Very good and controlled presentation
2.To be short you aced it!
3.Perhaps as an ongoing challenge you could consider working on your pronausation (but so could the most of us).
    2.Aishwarya
1.Good presentation
2.work a little bit on being a bit more comfy and I am sure it will improve your transition and connection between the slides and your team-mates.
3.Also your voice is getting stronger, so your on the way.
    3.Federico
1.Nice and easy
2.ending could have been a bit more smooth
    4.Tolga
1.Aced!
2.Good job, liked the ending and transition between your teammates.
    5.Thomas
1.Calm presenter
2.get the I or we straigth? Especially if your presenting for a group.
    6.All:
1.Looks like good team work! Thumps up for all of you...

2.Hedge fond
    1.Humaid
1.N/A (ill)
    2.Jerome
1.Goodmorning at 1.30 pm?
2.Good and calm, your walk/practice in the hall-way did its job.
    3.Kevin
1.Repeats and emphazises, very good.
2.Relates to Jerome, even better!
    4.Harald
1.Nice pace, perhaps a bit to monotone show some excitement (you reminded me of a drowsy bear just done hypernating, haha).
2.SWOT = to much text
3.Calm presenter
    5.Wang
1.Strong Voice, perhaps a bit to booming, but I liked it.
2.Typo's Shoose=Choose
3.Good logic
    6.Jerome
1.summary with learning outcome, was brilliant!
    7.All
1.Team work could be improved or set your team frames straight from the beginning (a lá German style).
2.Interesting project
   
3.Platform (by Federico)
    1.Caroline
1.No team Presentation?
2.Good vocal management; Voice and Pace.
    2.Carole
1.Careful with the ''This....''
2.Interaction with the board
    3.Anthony
1.Look towards the audience, not the floor.
2.''mmmmhhhhh''? Careful with that.
    4.Christian
1.Google Docs? I can't read it (and he was sitting on the front row!)
2.Good Conclusion
    5.All (by Chris):
1.Team work has fantastic.

4.Break (15 mins)
1.Everyone preformed excellent here!

5.Documentary
    1.Aris:
1.Ace! And you where on the/your right side of the presentation!
    2.Charles
1.Calm and stone-cold presenter, almost scary to see how good it was.
2.Does your shirt go in or outside of your pants? Not sure both solutions should be applied?
    3.Stavroula
1.ACE!
    4.Ayo
1.Back against presentation, not the audience; we would love to see your face and we promise to smile...
2.consider less text
3.Could have been connected a bit better to the whole of the presentation
    5.Julie
1.You started out very well
2.Middle was good
3.ending was sudden and we missed eye-contact here. Did you get nervous?
    6.Charles
1.Poor you; I would assume the legal part, demands that much text?
    7.Hughe
1.Improve your skills with the pointer, but you where calm in the fray; nice!
2.Consider Fonts, eye-contact and your logic (the thin-red line connecting everything)?
3.Good Graphs/slides
    8.Remi
1.Relating to what Julie and Stavroula presented, good!
2.Ending could have been better, did you get timid or unsure?
3.Besides that good one.
    9.Marren
1.Watch out for your excitement. It is very good to see and I like it, but it reduces the comprehensibility of what your saying.
2.Your brain goes so fast that your mouth can't follow.
3.Put a ban on 'Øhms' and 'Øh', I counted 54 from the middle
4.I am sure if you would have had some anstecia you would have Aced as well!
    10.All:
1.Picture --> consider the seize and if it is readable (like the Platform tools and method case)
2.Endings/transitions and the total collaboration could have been better.
3.Team seemed to be working more or less good.

6.Fashion Group
    1.Magdalena
1.Nice opening
2.as orrator, you have to be careful when you cut of people. Even if you are just doing so to present their names.
    2.Sara
1.Q-cards --> thumps up, good!
2.A little fewer of thoses yeah's will not hurt
3.calm presenter
    3.Sarah
1.Eye-contact – check
2.calm presenting – check
3.consider the use of words like 'whatever' and 'stuff'
    4.Magdalena
1.transition – check
    5.Svetlana
1.Nice and firm voice
2.consider a little expressing a little more with your hands or body
3.paper (see Sara's Q-cards)
    6.Katharina
1.expressive body languge, using hands and body. Consider showing Svetlana?
2.Weeks or hours? Think before you speak ;)
    7.Magdalena
1.Eisenhower – omg, I like your planing fetish...! please do not lose it, when ever I am in need of an planing/logistic expert I know where to go.
2.Steady here she goes – orrator and facilitating is good, very much.
    8.Levon
1.Calm presenter
2.Did you get nervous or lost at the end/middle?
3.Consider to use some of the breaks you had in the beginning of your presentation in the end of it as well.
    9.Magdalena
1.easy
    10.Anne
1.Calm and stable presenter
2.consider eye-contact for the students as well. I know Majetic and Wittig are hot, but some of us are not to bad looking as well...
3.Voice is good
    11.Svetlana:
1.Good ending and little more body-show-off ;)
    12.Magdalena
1.nice fading out of the presentation
    13.All
1.Body towards audience – check and that goes for all of you!
2.Good shifts and collaboration
3.I saw smiles between some of your! nice!

Second Midterm Presentations 15.12.09

Thomas on Asperado:
- SaaS slide consider a better overview of pictures
- Time of essence (in order not to hurry next time)
- Managed the lack of time very good
- Video was a good media
- Tamm: Methods (The VBA is yours to claim)

Anthony & Carol on Saft fabrik:
- Extremly good synergy... the timing and sparring of each other was superb
- Colours: Red and Black is perhaps not the best mixture
- Coffee, not Coffe ;)
- Compliments on the team work again!

Iris on SRH:
- Perfect
- would like more infomation on the selection criterias for the professorship, since you where good on time?

Julie on Borgmann:
- Handled the 2 min notice from Tamm brilliantly and very calm. You are improving and fast, congrats!
- Colours Red & black and Red & blue are perhaps again not the best mixture?
- Did I hear you compare the Website of Borgmann to Amazone?
- From, not Form ;)

Axel on Borgmann:
- good standards, hard to figure out very to improve
- Apothecary = perhaps do not use words your unsure about
- Brought ressources
- Books (I love books!)
- Liquor (omg, this guy was flirting with me!)
- also look up gammel dansk, similar liqour from Denmark. As well as Danzka Vodka, similar design, again from Denmark.

Harold on Shan:
- Calm = good voice and pace, much better then the presentation on hedge fonds!
- solution for Java problem could also be Tags or not?
- Perhaps also elaborate on PP-slides? Their is plenty room for text.
- Consider optimizing Web-site as your new Role?

Svetlana & Katharina on Shan:
- Interesting approach to the use of PP-slides, you will continue with the last three subjects next time?
- Svetlana -> leave that Pen alone!
- Consider clustering Target groups, ask and see Levon
- Litterature review, can never be finished ;)
- Data unavailability (love it!)
- Colours: try staying Black & White. Leave green away, looks less attractive.

Sarah & Humaid on Shan:
- Interesting approach of the timing on presenting the task on the PP-slide.
- Perhaps specify the task a little more?
- Consider clustering target groups (see above and Levon)
- Good and easy presentation
- remember the Mac conversion for next time ;)

Teachers:
- Tamm
- You do not check e-mails when your students are presenting their hard work and toil..!
- Kai
- Do not be late, set standards.
- Kai & Tamm:
- save the High-fives and christmas talks for the breaks
- Frank:
- learnt the meaning of Ebrasserie and more (I hope!)
- Other guy:
- It would be nice if you said something, perhaps just a cough to know your there?

First Midterm Presentations 8.12.09

Christian on Cloud storage:
   - Academic references needed
   - Hand-out (contradiction?)
   - Speed (pace and slow down)

Kevin & Jerome on Efitness:
   - Easy structure
   - Could be a bit more detailed

Amanda, Tobias, Remi and Charles on Audible:
   - Time (made it just in Time)
   - Mantis = is a Bug-eating Insect. Is Green and hides in leaves to pray on its game.
   - perhaps consider a online Application for Bug reporting?

Tolga & Julia on Audible:
   - Very nice structured
   - You had more time to elaborate into some details, if you wanted to?

Federico & Ayo on T-mobile:
   - Was missing Ayo's voice
   - consider changing the picture on the definition slide (I know there are better ones in the cloud!)
   - Change project details in the SRH-wiki
   - Liked your explanation of the power grid. As well ads Asset contra pay-as-you-go, perhaps consider using the later as definition or E.g. on the slide?

Levon on Freshmilk:
   - Good Structure
   - Very detailed (would like to have a digital copy?)
   - Speed (pace yourself). Perhaps even minimize your content in order to make it in time?
   - And as Kai said: consider clustering Segments?

Hugues, Stavroula and Aris on Gerry Weber:
   - Good Structure and Speed
   - Liked the Hand-out (in colour!)
   - consider the audience (eye-contact and smile)

Magdalena on Gerry Weber:
   - Very detailed. perhaps consider to share it with the audience for a greater impact, depth and preparations in advance?
   - You had a very good audience conection.

Julia & Tolga