The Project Development Presentations with Majetic and co-starring Eichhorn and Wittig 12-01-2010

1.Around the world
    1.Iris
1.Very good and controlled presentation
2.To be short you aced it!
3.Perhaps as an ongoing challenge you could consider working on your pronausation (but so could the most of us).
    2.Aishwarya
1.Good presentation
2.work a little bit on being a bit more comfy and I am sure it will improve your transition and connection between the slides and your team-mates.
3.Also your voice is getting stronger, so your on the way.
    3.Federico
1.Nice and easy
2.ending could have been a bit more smooth
    4.Tolga
1.Aced!
2.Good job, liked the ending and transition between your teammates.
    5.Thomas
1.Calm presenter
2.get the I or we straigth? Especially if your presenting for a group.
    6.All:
1.Looks like good team work! Thumps up for all of you...

2.Hedge fond
    1.Humaid
1.N/A (ill)
    2.Jerome
1.Goodmorning at 1.30 pm?
2.Good and calm, your walk/practice in the hall-way did its job.
    3.Kevin
1.Repeats and emphazises, very good.
2.Relates to Jerome, even better!
    4.Harald
1.Nice pace, perhaps a bit to monotone show some excitement (you reminded me of a drowsy bear just done hypernating, haha).
2.SWOT = to much text
3.Calm presenter
    5.Wang
1.Strong Voice, perhaps a bit to booming, but I liked it.
2.Typo's Shoose=Choose
3.Good logic
    6.Jerome
1.summary with learning outcome, was brilliant!
    7.All
1.Team work could be improved or set your team frames straight from the beginning (a lá German style).
2.Interesting project
   
3.Platform (by Federico)
    1.Caroline
1.No team Presentation?
2.Good vocal management; Voice and Pace.
    2.Carole
1.Careful with the ''This....''
2.Interaction with the board
    3.Anthony
1.Look towards the audience, not the floor.
2.''mmmmhhhhh''? Careful with that.
    4.Christian
1.Google Docs? I can't read it (and he was sitting on the front row!)
2.Good Conclusion
    5.All (by Chris):
1.Team work has fantastic.

4.Break (15 mins)
1.Everyone preformed excellent here!

5.Documentary
    1.Aris:
1.Ace! And you where on the/your right side of the presentation!
    2.Charles
1.Calm and stone-cold presenter, almost scary to see how good it was.
2.Does your shirt go in or outside of your pants? Not sure both solutions should be applied?
    3.Stavroula
1.ACE!
    4.Ayo
1.Back against presentation, not the audience; we would love to see your face and we promise to smile...
2.consider less text
3.Could have been connected a bit better to the whole of the presentation
    5.Julie
1.You started out very well
2.Middle was good
3.ending was sudden and we missed eye-contact here. Did you get nervous?
    6.Charles
1.Poor you; I would assume the legal part, demands that much text?
    7.Hughe
1.Improve your skills with the pointer, but you where calm in the fray; nice!
2.Consider Fonts, eye-contact and your logic (the thin-red line connecting everything)?
3.Good Graphs/slides
    8.Remi
1.Relating to what Julie and Stavroula presented, good!
2.Ending could have been better, did you get timid or unsure?
3.Besides that good one.
    9.Marren
1.Watch out for your excitement. It is very good to see and I like it, but it reduces the comprehensibility of what your saying.
2.Your brain goes so fast that your mouth can't follow.
3.Put a ban on 'Øhms' and 'Øh', I counted 54 from the middle
4.I am sure if you would have had some anstecia you would have Aced as well!
    10.All:
1.Picture --> consider the seize and if it is readable (like the Platform tools and method case)
2.Endings/transitions and the total collaboration could have been better.
3.Team seemed to be working more or less good.

6.Fashion Group
    1.Magdalena
1.Nice opening
2.as orrator, you have to be careful when you cut of people. Even if you are just doing so to present their names.
    2.Sara
1.Q-cards --> thumps up, good!
2.A little fewer of thoses yeah's will not hurt
3.calm presenter
    3.Sarah
1.Eye-contact – check
2.calm presenting – check
3.consider the use of words like 'whatever' and 'stuff'
    4.Magdalena
1.transition – check
    5.Svetlana
1.Nice and firm voice
2.consider a little expressing a little more with your hands or body
3.paper (see Sara's Q-cards)
    6.Katharina
1.expressive body languge, using hands and body. Consider showing Svetlana?
2.Weeks or hours? Think before you speak ;)
    7.Magdalena
1.Eisenhower – omg, I like your planing fetish...! please do not lose it, when ever I am in need of an planing/logistic expert I know where to go.
2.Steady here she goes – orrator and facilitating is good, very much.
    8.Levon
1.Calm presenter
2.Did you get nervous or lost at the end/middle?
3.Consider to use some of the breaks you had in the beginning of your presentation in the end of it as well.
    9.Magdalena
1.easy
    10.Anne
1.Calm and stable presenter
2.consider eye-contact for the students as well. I know Majetic and Wittig are hot, but some of us are not to bad looking as well...
3.Voice is good
    11.Svetlana:
1.Good ending and little more body-show-off ;)
    12.Magdalena
1.nice fading out of the presentation
    13.All
1.Body towards audience – check and that goes for all of you!
2.Good shifts and collaboration
3.I saw smiles between some of your! nice!